Skip to content
ALL Metrics
-
Views
110
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Study Protocol
Revised

Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 03 Dec 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a skin neglected tropical disease, with an estimated 40,000 new cases each year in Ethiopia. CL causes ulcers, nodules, and plaques on the skin, and in some instances the destruction of the nasopharyngeal mucosa and cartilage. Some CL lesions may heal spontaneously, whilst other lesions may require therapies which are associated with discomfort, adverse effects, prolonged treatment, and a frequent lack of a complete response. Scarring, a sequela of CL, causes permanent disfigurement and is associated with stigma linked with a reduction in health-related quality of life.

The choice of treatment for CL is based upon factors including the causative species; the number, extent, size, and location of lesions; and the availability of treatments. The development of robust evidence for CL treatment is hindered by a lack of validated and appropriate outcome measures and few data to support hypothesis-generation and trial design. There is a paucity of prospective data with well-defined treatment outcomes for CL caused by L. aethiopica.

Aim

The overall aim of this study is to improve the understanding of the health and economic burden of CL.

Methods

We have designed an observational, multi-centre cohort study to examine treatment outcomes for CL in Ethiopia which includes clinical outcomes, laboratory outcomes, patient reported outcome measures, scar assessments and cost effectiveness. We aim to recruit up to 750 participants across two hospital sites. We present here the protocol for this cohort study with a 12-month follow up period for each participant.

Conclusions

These data will inform the design of randomized controlled trials to evaluate new treatment strategies, with appropriate economic evaluations. This will help improve evidence-based guidelines and support evidence-led policy decisions, not only in Ethiopia but also globally.

Plain Language Summary

Plain English summary
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a skin neglected tropical disease, with an estimated 40,000 new cases each year in Ethiopia. CL is transmitted by the bite of a sand fly on exposed areas, often the face, resulting in ulcers, nodules, and plaques on the skin, and in some instances the destruction of the nasopharyngeal mucosa and cartilage. Some CL lesions may heal spontaneously, whilst other lesions may require therapies which are associated with discomfort, adverse effects, prolonged treatment, and a frequent lack of a complete response. Scarring, a sequela of CL, causes permanent disfigurement and is associated with stigma linked with a reduction in health-related quality of life.
The choice of treatment for CL is based upon factors including the causative species; the number, extent, size, and location of lesions; and the availability of treatments. The development of robust evidence for CL treatment is hindered by a lack of validated and appropriate outcome measures and few data to support hypothesis-generation and trial design. There is a paucity of prospective data with well-defined treatment outcomes for CL caused by L. aethiopica. We therefore designed an observational, multi-centre cohort study to examine treatment outcomes for CL in Ethiopia which includes clinical outcomes, laboratory outcomes, patient reported outcome measures, scar assessments and cost effectiveness.
These essential data will inform the design of randomized controlled trials to evaluate new treatment strategies, with appropriate economic evaluations. This will help improve evidence-based guidelines and support evidence-led policy decisions, not only in Ethiopia but also globally.

Keywords

Cutaneous leishmaniasis, L. aethiopica, clinical outcomes measure, scar assessment, cost effectiveness, patient reported outcome measures, Ethiopia

Revised Amendments from Version 1

The revised version includes changes following comments by our two reviewers in order to enhance the clarity and flow of the paper. Sentence construction in the introduction has been improved. Under methods, a clarification has been added under the headings "Study participants" and "Overview of the data collection", with an in-depth description of immunology samples as suggested by reviewers. The sample size section has been more clearly defined.

In the data analysis section, details of software to be used for data analysis and statistical tests that will be used were expanded for each part of the study objectives in order the clarify the analysis methods.

This large cohort study has multiple parts with multiple methodologies:
•    Clinical: Observation of clinical features, treatments given, clinical outcomes as well as patient reported outcome measure (quantitative). The development of a severity scale.
•    Psychosocial: patient’s treatment experience using ethnographic methods (qualitative) 
•    Economic burden of CL: Serial economic evaluations (quantitative)
•    Immunological investigations on skin and blood samples – quantitative laboratory research

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Talal Alharazi
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Najia Ahmed

Introduction

Up to a million new cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) occur each year, primarily in the world’s poorest communities1. CL is the most common form of leishmaniasis, which is caused by infection with protozoa of the genus Leishmania, acquired via the bite of a female phlebotomine sandfly. Infection leads to the development of ulcers, nodules, and plaques on the skin. Depending on the infecting Leishmania species, spontaneous resolution of infection can take many months or years and medical therapies are associated with discomfort, adverse effects, prolonged treatment, and a frequent lack of complete response (World Health Organization). Lesions often heal with lifelong scarring or destruction of the nasopharyngeal mucosa causing permanent disfigurement, and associated stigma, and overall psychological morbidity, contributing to a reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL)2. These multidimensional morbidities and the often-arduous process of treatment-seeking also impose a substantial economic burden in terms of both costs of care and income loss, which can exacerbate the stress and social impact associated with CL and inhibit access to care35.

The choice of treatment for CL is based upon several factors including the causative species; the number, extent, size and location of lesions; and the availability of treatments. Small lesions not located near a joint or facial structure may be allowed to self-heal or be treated with a topical agent, intra-lesional injection, cryotherapy, or heat therapy. Localised treatments for CL are associated with irritation, pain, discomfort, and in the case of cryotherapy, long-term skin changes6. Large or widespread lesions and those involving the mucosa require systemic treatment7,8. Despite the large number of cases of CL each year, the evidence for determining the best treatment modality remains limited.

In Ethiopia, CL is a growing public health problem, with an estimated 40,000 new cases each year. Several Leishmania species cause CL in Ethiopia; most infections are thought to be due to L. aethiopica9, but L. donovani, L. major and L. tropica are also present. L. aethiopica is associated with three distinct clinical forms of CL; localised CL (LCL); mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL); and diffuse CL (DCL), which is the most disfiguring and difficult to treat9. Lesions caused by L. aethiopica most commonly occur on the face10. The diverse range of clinical phenotypes and presentations makes early diagnosis by community-based health workers difficult. Standard CL treatment in Ethiopia is with intralesional or parenteral sodium stibogluconate (SSG), which may be combined with cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen. There is a particular paucity of prospective data with well-defined treatment outcomes for CL caused by L. aethiopica. A systematic review of treatment for CL caused by L. aethiopica identified two randomised trials with a total of 26 participants and two prospective, non-randomised studies11. All four studies were assessed to have methodological limitations by the authors. One of the small, randomised trials compared itraconazole with placebo (n=14 participants)12 and the other compared rifampicin, isoniazid and amithiozone with pentamidine (n=12 participants)13. The much larger prospective study (n=123) reported improvement in various forms of CL: 103 (81%) of participants were cured with liquid nitrogen cryotherapy and 85% of the 20 participants treated with intramuscular SSG (20 mg/kg up to a maximum of 850mg daily) for 30 days were cured14. Another Ethiopian study reported that 21% of participants (n= 167) had “a positive outcome” with intralesional pentavalent antimonial drug meglumine antimoniate (MA) and 47% had “a positive outcome” with systemic MA (20 mg/kg)15.

The development of robust evidence for CL treatment is hindered by a lack of validated and appropriate outcome measures and few data to support hypothesis-generation and trial design. A Cochrane review demonstrated that existing studies used heterogeneous outcome measures which mostly lacked validity, hindering comparison of study results16. A consensus document on “harmonized” clinical research methodologies for LCL (but not MCL or DCL) was published by an international group of experts following meetings organised by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative17. This publication highlighted the importance of laboratory confirmation with identification of Leishmania species in future trials and defined “initial” cure for non-American CL as more than 50% re-epithelialization (if an ulcer) or flattening (if a non-ulcerated lesion) at Day 42; and as 100% re-epithelialization or flattening at Day 90. “Final” cure was defined as 100% re-epithelialization or flattening at Day 180. More recently, open label studies, incorporating these expert-agreed outcomes, were conducted on treatment for CL due to L. aethiopica. One study reported physician-determined cure rates of 59.7% for intralesional SSG18 at Day 90, whilst another study reported physician-determined cure rates of 12.5% and 72.7% for miltefosine19 at two study sites at Day 90.

The “harmonized” clinical research methodologies for LCL provided a significant step forward but several gaps remain. No agreed methodologies are available for assessing flattening or re-epithelisation and it remains unclear if outcomes should be measured from the start or end of a course of treatment. The agreed outcome measures are entirely clinical and do not include measures to reflect the outcomes and experiences of affected individuals. The treatment preferences of individuals may be influenced by the frequency of adverse events and the extent to which healing improves their health and psychosocial wellbeing. Appropriate patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) therefore need to be identified and collected alongside clinical measures. Finally, the consensus document recognised that scarring should be assessed as a long-term outcome but did not propose a method for doing so.

Given the scarcity of resources for health, and for the treatment of CL in particular, treatment recommendations should also be informed by an understanding of costs and efficiency. However, cost-effectiveness analyses of alternative treatment strategies for non-American CL have only been conducted in Asia2023, none have addressed infection with L. aethiopica, and only one has assessed effectiveness using a multidimensional outcome metric20, which is essential for comparing the value of investments across intervention types and diseases. No studies of the economic burden of CL or treatment costs in Africa have been published.

The Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) has identified an urgent need for the evaluation of treatments alternatives for all forms of CL. Such evaluation requires better understanding of outcomes, and cost-effectiveness data. We therefore designed an observational, multi-centre cohort study of CL in Ethiopia24.

Aims & objectives

The overall aim of this study is to improve the understanding of the health, psychosocial and economic burden of CL, and to lay the groundwork for well-designed, randomized controlled trials and economic evaluations of alternative CL treatments in Ethiopia.

Objectives

  • 1. To assess clinical outcomes in LCL, MCL and DCL in a prospective cohort

  • 2. To assess clinical parameters in LCL, MCL and DCL in a prospective cohort

  • 3. To assess the change in HRQoL associated with CL before and after treatment.

  • 4. To develop a severity scale for CL

  • 5. To understand the lived experiences of individuals with CL attending a referral centre by conducting in-depth interviews

  • 6. To assess household costs of CL, health care provider and societal costs of treating CL

  • 7. To characterise how cell-mediated immune responses associate with treatment responses in CL due to L. aethiopica and Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) variation correlate with different clinical phenotypes.

Methods

Patient and Public Involvement

Patients with CL were involved in the validation of the translations of PROMs through focus group discussions, cultural adaptation and piloting.

Study context

The study will enrol individuals receiving treatment for CL at two centres: ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa and Boru Meda Hospital, South Wollo Zone, Amhara Region. ALERT Hospital serves as both a general hospital for patients in Addis Ababa and a regional and national specialized referral centre for individuals with CL and other skin conditions. The hospital has nine dermatologists and a 20-bed unit for the care of patients with CL and diagnoses approximately 1000 cases of CL managed on an inpatient or outpatient basis each year. Boru Meda serves as the general hospital and specialised referral service for all skin conditions in South Wollo zone. It has two dermatologists, and a 35-bed unit for the management of CL and diagnoses around 700 cases of CL, managed on an inpatient or outpatient basis each year.

Timelines

Study recruitment began in April 2022 and is expected to continue until the sample size is reached or until the cut-off of September 30th, 2023, whichever occurs first. Follow-up is therefore expected to be completed by September 30th, 2024.

Study participants and management

All adults and children diagnosed with CL and initiated on CL treatment at both study centres are eligible to be recruited in this study. Each participant will be followed for 360 days.

Inclusion criteria:

1. Individuals with parasitologically confirmed CL using microscopy or culture

2. Individuals receiving treatment at the study centres

Exclusion criteria:

1. Participants who have previously been treated with systemic anti-leishmania therapy

2. Participants who do not or are unable to give informed consent to participate in the study

Participants will be treated using the standard of care for CL at the centre where they are managed and in accordance with the Ethiopian national guideline24 which will be agreed by two clinicians in consultation with the affected individual prior to enrolment. The treatment may be changed if deemed clinically appropriate. In general, if the size of the skin lesion is 4cm in diameter of smaller and not near a mucosal site the first line treatment is most frequently local therapy (cryotherapy and/or intralesional SSG). In general, if the diameter of the skin lesion is greater than 4 cm and/or near or involving a mucosal surface the initial therapy is usually intramuscular SSG for 28 days with or without adjunctive cryotherapy. Participants will be assessed on day 42 and further local or systemic therapy may be offered depending on the degree of clinical response.

We will classify CL using the operational definitions shown in Box 1.

Box 1. Operational definitions of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL)

  • •    CL is diagnosed in a person with skin and/or mucosal lesions with evidence of Leishmania infection in the affected tissues characterised by the presence of Leishmania amastigotes on smear microscopy or growth of Leishmania promastigotes in culture or the detection of Leishmania DNA by polymerase chain reaction.

  • •    Localized CL: A confirmed case of leishmaniasis, with no mucosal involvement, characterized by ten or fewer cutaneous papules and/or nodules and/or plaques with or without ulceration involving one body site

  • •    Multi-regional localized CL: A confirmed case of leishmaniasis, with no mucosal involvement, characterized by ten or fewer cutaneous papules and/or nodules and/or plaques with or without ulceration involving two or more body sites

  • •    Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis: A confirmed case of leishmaniasis characterized by ten or fewer papules and/or nodules and/or plaques with or without ulceration involving skin and an adjacent mucosal surface

  • •    Mucosal leishmaniasis: A confirmed case of leishmaniasis characterized by papules and/or nodules and/or plaques with or without ulceration involving exclusively a mucosal surface

  • •    Diffuse CL: A confirmed case of leishmaniasis characterized by eleven or more papules and/or nodules and/or plaques with or without mucosal involvement.

Body sites are classified as:

1. Head and neck

2. Torso - anterior (including genitalia)

3. Torso - posterior (including buttocks)

4. Right upper limb

5. Left upper limb

6. Right lower limb

7. Left lower limb

Overview of data collection

This prospective observational cohort will integrate different methodologies appropriate to the different “areas” under investigation, using qualitative and quantitative tools:

  • Clinical: Observation of clinical features, treatments given, clinical outcomes as well as patient related outcome measure (quantitative)

  • Psychosocial: serial patient related outcome measures (quantitative) and in-depth interviews (qualitative)

  • Economic burden of CL: Serial economic evaluations

  • Immunological investigations on skin and blood samples – quantitative laboratory research

Study visits for data collection are scheduled at day 1, 14, 28, 42, 90, 180 and 360 (Table 1). Treatment will be decided by the treating clinicians, who may or may not be one of the study dermatologists. All study specific data collection will be undertaken by a member of the study team. At the baseline visit, we will collect socio-demographic data, perform clinical assessment, and collect data on PROMs and costs. Follow-up data will be collected for all patients at specified time points, as detailed further below. In a subset of patients, additional biological samples will be collected for immunological and genetic studies. A further subset of participants will be selected for in-depth interviews.

Table 1. Timetable of planned reviews and activities.

PSOAS-2: Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale version 2; DLQI: Dermatology Life Quality Index; CDLQI: Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index; CLIQ: Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Impact Questionnaire; HLA: Human Leucocyte Antigen; PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

Day 1 (before 1st treatment)Day 14Day 28 (end of 1st cycle of systemic treatment)Day 42Day 90Day 180Day 360
Participant and physician assessment of change XXXXX
Adverse reaction monitoring (if on treatment) XXX X
Pain assessment XXX
Test of cure (if not healed) X
Scar assessment (PSOAS-2) XXXX
DLQI/CDLQI XXXXXX
EQ-5D-5L XXXXXXX
SF36 XXXXX
CLIQ XXXX
Household costs XXXXXXX
Immunological studies blood sample (subset) XXX
HLA typing blood sample X
Slit-skin smear for PCR XX
Skin biopsy (subset of adults only) XX
Digital image XXX XX XX

Clinical data

At the baseline visit, we will record the clinical phenotype of CL including the number, size, morphology25 and location of lesions. Lesion dimensions (defined as the largest diameter of the lesion) will be measured using a disposable tape measure. Individuals with more than one lesion will be asked to indicate the lesion causing greatest concern and this will be designated the “index” lesion. Individuals may indicate two or more lesions of equal concern. In those with mucosal involvement, mucosal signs and symptoms are recorded. Clinicians will then provide a subjective global assessment of CL severity using a 3-point Likert scale (mild, moderate, severe). Slit-skin smears will be collected at baseline for microscopy and species identification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

At each follow-up visit, we will assess lesions for the degree of re-epithelization or flattening. For those with DCL, the number of resolved lesions and percent of lesions flattened per region is recorded. Clinicians will provide a global assessment of the improvement or worsening of CL using a 5-point Likert scale (worse, no change, minor improvement, major improvement, cure). At each visit, we will record the treatment being administered and any changes since the last visit. The adverse reactions to CL treatments will be assessed including the nature and severity of the reaction, the action taken, the presumed cause and the outcome. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 will be used for describing adverse reactions and grading their severity. Slit-skin smear samples will be collected at day 90 for test of cure if the skin lesion is not healed.

PROMs

At baseline, Amharic or Oromiffa translations of several PROMs will be collected (Table 1): two general measures of HRQoL, the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-36, and two skin-specific measures of HRQoL, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI). Participants will complete the Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Impact Questionnaire (CLIQ), a CL-specific measure of HRQoL.

At the follow-up visits indicated in Table 1, we will collect PROMs again and ask participants for their global assessment of the improvement of their CL lesion(s) using a 5-point Likert scale (better, somewhat better, same, somewhat worse, worse). The Amharic or Afan Oromo translations of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) v226 will be completed by both the clinician and participant at the day 42 assessment and each subsequent visit.

Lived experience

A selection of participants will be recruited to participate in an in-depth interview to capture data on their lived experience of CL until data saturation has occurred. Initially, we aim to recruit a total of 30 adults and 10 children from both study centres. We will ensure representation of participants by key demographics including age, gender, and CL phenotype. Interviews will be conducted by members of the research team using a topic-guide covering key themes including the impact of the illness, the care-seeking pathways they have undertaken and their experience of traditional and allopathic medicine. Ethnographic observation will be used to enrich the data on treatment experiences in the health facilities.

Costs

At baseline data will be collected on costs incurred by the individuals and their household that can be attributed to a member having CL and/or seeking treatment for CL including costs incurred since onset of CL symptoms. We will also collect data on household income, expenditure, and asset possession to establish a month of income and expenditure data.

At each follow up visit, cost related to CL since the last visit/admission will be collected. These will include costs of medicines, hospitalisation, consultation, transportation, and opportunity costs related to having and treating CL (i.e., missed work or school). We will also collect information on how households cope with the economic burden of CL.

Data from the provider perspective will be collected. This will include costs of training health workers, providing services, medicines donated, and other service-related costs. These costs will be collected from the project’s activity and financial records; the value of any donated items will be estimated based on market prices. Where necessary, government and donor sources will be consulted for relevant cost data.

Immunology samples

To interrogate the dynamics of immune responses in different clinical phenotypes of CL, blood and skin lesion samples will be collected at three time points. Participants will have blood samples and a skin biopsy (stored in RNAlater™) taken to evaluate subsets of the innate and adaptive immunity; pro-inflammatory (IFN-γ and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-6, IL-27, IL-10, IL-4, IL-13, TGF-β, and hsp18) cytokines and interleukins (IL)-12, IL-2, IL-1, IL-18, IL-15, IL-8, IL-17A, and IL-22) using Luminex multiplex assay. (ii) The change in mRNA (Ribonucleic acid) expression level of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and pro-inflammatory (IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-1β, IL-17A, and IL-12p70) and anti-inflammatory (IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-4, TGF-β, and hsp18) cytokines will also be assessed before treatment (at day 0), during treatment (day 28) and after completion of treatment (day 90) using quantitative PCR (Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction). In addition, the levels of chemokines (such as CXCL8, CXCL10, CCL5, CCL4, CCL3, and CCL2) will be determined in supernatants from the whole blood stimulation assays for the Luminex multiplex assay. HLA typing will be performed to assess if there is an association between HLA types (targeting probes for HLA-A, B, C, DR, DQ, and DP loci) and the clinical phenotypes of CL seen in our cohort.

Sample Size

The primary outcome is the proportion of individuals with a healed index lesion by study day 90. In line with the consensus document on clinical trial outcomes cure will be defined as 100% re-epithelialization or flattening of the index lesion. Pre-specified additional outcomes are the proportion healed at day 42 and 180. Secondary outcomes include the frequency of adverse events and measures of HRQoL life.

There are no pre-existing high-quality data on cure rates for CL caused by L. aethiopica. We calculated the sample size required to measure a range of cure-rates at 90 days with varying degrees of precision (Table 2). Based on this we aimed to recruit up to 250 participants with each CL phenotype (LCL, MCL, and DCL) across the two sites. We anticipate that mucosal leishmaniasis will be rare and will recruit as many individuals with this type of disease as possible.

Table 2. Sample sizes required to detect a range of cure rates with varying precision at day 90.

Sample sizePercentage cured at 90 days
50607080
50±13.1±13.6±12.7±11.1
100±9.8±9.6±9.0±7.8
150±8.0±7.8±7.3±6.4
200±6.9±6.8±6.4±5.5
250±6.2±6.1±5.7±5.0

Data analysis

Objective 1: To assess clinical outcomes in LCL, MCL and DCL in a prospective cohort. & Objective 2: To assess clinical parameters in LCL, MCL and DCL in a prospective cohort.

We will use descriptive statistics (means, medians, and proportions) to describe demographics and baseline characteristics of the cohort. In exploratory analysis, we will use univariable logistic regression to examine clinical and demographic variables associated with resolution of CL at Day 42, 90, and 180. Whilst not formally powered for these analyses, the findings will be viewed as hypothesis-generating and potentially form the basis for future studies.

Objective 3: To assess the change in HRQoL associated with CL before and after treatment.

Changes in general, skin and CL-specific HRQoL will be assessed using the following PROMs: EQ-5D-5L, SF-36, DLQI/ CDLQI and CLIQ applied at the timepoints shown in Table 1, and compared with clinical outcomes to determine validity and responsiveness.

Validity and responsiveness of each PROM will be analysed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics will be presented using frequencies, percentages, tables, and graphs.

Mean rank sum scores of each of sub-domains will be recorded using Kruskal Wallis rank sum test among as well as the different clinical (LCL, MCL and DCL) types of lesions to check known-group construct validity. Wilcoxon-signed rank test will be used to compare mean difference of scores before initiation of treatment (Day 0) and at Day 90 (date of initial cure assessment).

Objective 4: To develop a severity scale for CL.

A round table CL expert discussion forum, informed by preliminary data, will be held, and consensus reached about potential items and scoring system for a severity scale. The prototype will be tested in individuals with CL at diagnosis.

Objective 5: To understand the lived experiences of individuals with CL.

Recordings will be transcribed and translated verbatim, and interviewer’s notes included for each interview. A codebook will be developed, and thematic analysis will be used. MAXQDA plus 2022 will be used to manage the in-depth interview data.

Objective 6: To assess household costs of CL, and health care provider, and societal costs of treating CL.

We will assess costs from a disaggregated societal perspective, examining costs to providers (MOH, donors), households, and society as a whole (i.e., costs to providers and household combined). Incremental costs to providers will be estimated relative to a hypothetical counterfactual in which no treatment for CL is provided. Incremental costs to households will be estimated relative to a hypothetical counterfactual in which the CL infection has not occurred. We will estimate total costs of diagnostic and treatment strategies and average costs, including cost per case diagnosed and cost per case resolved, disaggregated by site, type of CL, and patient characteristics (where possible), with appropriate statistical measures of variation. We will explore the degree of impoverishing and catastrophic expenditure for families of individuals with CL.

Descriptive statistics frequencies, percentages, means and medians will be used as appropriate to estimate costs. Further analysis will be conducted to investigate catastrophic out-of-pocket health expenditure and poverty impact using a linear probability model. STATA version 17 will be used for data analysis

Objective 7: To characterise how cell-mediated immune responses associate with treatment responses in CL due to L. aethiopica and (HLA) variation correlate with different clinical phenotypes.

Biopsies of affected skin and blood samples will be analysed to (i) evaluate secretion and quantification of selected host cytokines via the LuminexⓇ platform, (ii) evaluate the expression of innate/adaptive, and pro-and anti-inflammatory biomarkers and by evaluating the change in mRNA expression level of TLRs and pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines before treatment, during treatment, and after completion of treatment.

Statistical analyses of laboratory data will be performed using R (version 4.4.1, the R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Nonparametric Mann-Whitney statistics will be used to compare different groups. Differences in cytokine and chemokine concentrations and mRNA expressions among CL types, treatment outcomes, time points, and other variables will be compared by the Kruskal-Wallis and t-tests. Fisher's exact test will be employed to determine the association between HLA types and CL types.

Data management

Each participant will be assigned a unique study identification number and all data will be recorded and analysed with this unique identification number. Data will be electronically entered into a GCP-compliant, trial-specific study database [Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap), Nashville, TN, USA]. Access to the database will be restricted to relevant researchers within the study team. Relevant documentation will be kept for a minimum of 10 years. Moreover, MAXQDA plus 2022 will be used to manage the in-depth interview data.

Ethics

Ethical approval was obtained from AHRI/ALERT Ethics Review Committee (Ref: PO/23/21 dated 15.07.2021), the National Research Ethics Review Committee (Ref: 7/2-506/m259/35 dated 17.12.2021), and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref: 26421 dated 11.10.2021). Written individual informed consent will be obtained from all participants in the study (see Extended data27). For study participants under 18 years of age, consent from a responsible adult (parent, relative, guardian, legal representative) will be obtained. In addition, assent will be obtained from study participants aged 12 to 17 years.

Discussion

CL represents a major public health, psychosocial and economic problem both in Ethiopia and in the tropical – subtropical regions. A key target of the 2021–2030 WHO Neglected Tropical Diseases roadmap is a significant increase in the proportion of individuals with CL who are diagnosed and receive appropriate treatment. The 2021–25 Ethiopian strategic plan for Neglected Tropical Diseases, aims to meet the 2030 global target by increasing CL treatment centres from 14 to 30, diagnostic centres from 25 to 170 and to be able to detect 85% of cases and treat 95% of these. A better understanding of strategies to improve accessibility and treatment outcomes is a priority action to achieve this goal28.

There are currently few prospective data of well-defined treatment outcomes for individuals with CL caused by L. aethiopica, and no data on PROMs or costs. A large cohort of participants with CL will generate robust data on how outcomes are associated with key clinical characteristics such as lesion size, site and number. This will allow us to gain insights into expected clinical outcomes up to one year following treatment and accurately quantify the burden of adverse reactions associated with current treatments. There are new agents and combination therapies proposed for the treatment of leishmaniasis and our data will be valuable in helping design future trials of these approaches in individuals with L. aethiopica.

This prospective cohort study will generate the most comprehensive and holistic dataset of CL, combining clinician determined and patient reported outcomes alongside health economic and laboratory data to better capture the impact of CL for affected individuals, their families, and communities. These data will inform the design of randomised trials to evaluate new treatment strategies, help improve evidence-based guidelines and support evidence-led policy decisions.

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 03 Dec 2024
Revised
Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
  • Author Response 26 Oct 2024
    Saba Lambert, ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    26 Oct 2024
    Author Response
    STUDY PROTOCOL
    Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia
     
    RESPONSE TO COMMENTS:

    Dear Dr Ahmed,

    We are grateful for your careful review ... Continue reading
  • Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
VIEWS
812
 
downloads
110
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Mohammed AB, Mohammed FS, Zewdu FT et al. Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. NIHR Open Res 2024, 3:49 (https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13432.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 03 Dec 2024
Revised
Views
2
Cite
Reviewer Report 17 Jan 2025
Sara M. Robledo, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia 
Approved
VIEWS 2
Thank you for addressing all the previous comments comprehensively. After reviewing the protocol, I found the document complete and well-structured. It includes all the essential components required for such a study, and the methodology is clearly outlined. The authors have ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Robledo SM. Reviewer Report For: Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. NIHR Open Res 2024, 3:49 (https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.15037.r34052)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
3
Cite
Reviewer Report 11 Jan 2025
Najia Ahmed, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan;  Dermatology, Pakistan Naval Station Shifa Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan 
Approved
VIEWS 3
Thanks for re- review. Most of the observations have been explained except why using ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ahmed N. Reviewer Report For: Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. NIHR Open Res 2024, 3:49 (https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.15037.r33926)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
Views
40
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Nov 2023
Talal Alharazi, Taiz University, Taiz, Yemen 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 40
Introduction
  • Shorten the background/introduction to be more concise for a quantitative study
Methods
  • Expand on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, especially related to prior treatments
     
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Alharazi T. Reviewer Report For: Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. NIHR Open Res 2024, 3:49 (https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14569.r30757)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 12 Dec 2024
    Saba Lambert, ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    12 Dec 2024
    Author Response
    Dear Dr Alharazi,

    We are grateful for your careful review of our protocol paper and your comments are important in helping us to improve it. We are addressing these ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 12 Dec 2024
    Saba Lambert, ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    12 Dec 2024
    Author Response
    Dear Dr Alharazi,

    We are grateful for your careful review of our protocol paper and your comments are important in helping us to improve it. We are addressing these ... Continue reading
Views
29
Cite
Reviewer Report 01 Nov 2023
Najia Ahmed, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan;  Dermatology, Pakistan Naval Station Shifa Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 29
  • The study design has been stated as prospective observational cohort but it appears to be a mixed method study as it also involves patient interviews and their experiences.
     
  • Introduction is too long
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ahmed N. Reviewer Report For: Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. NIHR Open Res 2024, 3:49 (https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14569.r30538)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 03 Dec 2024
    Saba Lambert, ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    03 Dec 2024
    Author Response
    RESPONSE TO COMMENTS:

    Dear Dr Ahmed

    We are grateful for your careful review of our protocol paper and your comments are important in helping us to improve it. ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 03 Dec 2024
    Saba Lambert, ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    03 Dec 2024
    Author Response
    RESPONSE TO COMMENTS:

    Dear Dr Ahmed

    We are grateful for your careful review of our protocol paper and your comments are important in helping us to improve it. ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (1)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 03 Dec 2024
Revised
Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Oct 2023
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
  • Author Response 26 Oct 2024
    Saba Lambert, ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    26 Oct 2024
    Author Response
    STUDY PROTOCOL
    Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ethiopia
     
    RESPONSE TO COMMENTS:

    Dear Dr Ahmed,

    We are grateful for your careful review ... Continue reading
  • Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Are you an NIHR-funded researcher?

If you are a previous or current NIHR award holder, sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from NIHR Open Research.

You must provide your first name
You must provide your last name
You must provide a valid email address
You must provide an institution.

Thank you!

We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to NIHR Open Research

Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.